Final answer:
The question contains a typo and actually pertains to the legality of electronic documents. A document that's electronically signed and notarized is considered an original document under legal frameworks like the E-SIGN Act, which gives it the same legal standing as a physically signed document.
Step-by-step explanation:
It appears that there is a confusion in the question presented. The mention of an electron is likely a typographical error, as electrons pertain to the field of physics and are elementary particles. On the other hand, the central query seems to address the validation of electronic documents within a legal context. The question suggests if a document that is signed electronically in the presence of a notary public and subsequently notarized with an electronic seal is deemed an original document.
The final answer to this question is: True. In the legal context of document authentication, an electronically signed and notarized document can indeed be considered an original document. This practice is more widely accepted due to advances in technology and legal frameworks which recognize electronic signatures and seals. Laws like the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (E-SIGN) Act in the United States, for instance, give electronic documents the same legal standing as physical documents signed in ink.
Thus, if all legal requirements are met, the mentioned document is legally binding and holds the same value as its physically signed counterpart.