Final answer:
The claim that peasant rebellions usually end with peasant groups getting what they desire and leaders being pardoned is false. Similarly, the Conciliatory Proposition did not meet most demands of the American colonists, also making that statement false.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that peasant rebellions usually end with the peasant groups getting what they want and the leaders pardoned is generally false. Historically, peasant rebellions have often arisen from severe grievances like economic hardship, political exploitation, and social injustices. These rebellions were typically led by various societal figures, including provincial elites, big landowners, and sometimes even bandits who turned to political action. However, the end result of such rebellions rarely saw the peasants achieving all of their goals, and the leaders of these uprisings were usually punished rather than pardoned.
Concerning the Conciliatory Proposition, the statement that the mother country gave in to most of the demands of the American colonists is false. The Conciliatory Proposition was an attempt by the British Parliament to address the concerns of the American colonists, but it fell short of conceding to most of their demands. The American Revolution proceeded, indicating that the colonists were not satisfied with Britain's concessions.