Final answer:
Doesbertone seems to employ both pathos and logos to bolster his argument, with pathos providing emotional connection through stories and logos offering logical backing with evidence. The most effective method is context-dependent.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student has asked whether doesbertone relies more on pathos (appeal to emotions) or logos (appeal to logic) to bolster his argument, and which method is more effective.
After analyzing the provided information, it seems that doesbertone employs both pathos and logos in his argumentation but the effectiveness largely depends on the context and the audience's values. From the reference materials, it appears that Desmond, for example, uses a combination of both strategies to effectively connect with and persuade his audience. Pathos is exemplified in the emotionally compelling stories such as Kamala's, which evoke empathy and make poverty personal rather than abstract. Logos, on the other hand, involves presenting facts, statistics, and sound logical reasoning to support an argument, establishing that the argument is well thought out and backed by evidence.
In conclusion, while pathos is powerful in evoking emotions and making arguments relatable, logos is equally important in providing a solid foundation of evidence and reasoning. The correct option in choosing between pathos and logos ultimately lies in assessing which appeal is more suited to the audience and the context of the argument.