Final answer:
The analysis of political cartoons involves the study of symbolism, analogy, and exaggeration to understand the cartoonist's viewpoint on the American system of checks and balances and other political matters.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the analysis of political cartoons and what they suggest about the American system of checks and balances. The analysis involves identifying the main argument of the cartoonist, any evidence or symbolism used to convey their message, and evaluating the effectiveness of their argument.
Moreover, if the cartoon touches on U.S. policy of neutrality, one can analyze whether the cartoonist supports this policy and what consequences they envision.
To effectively analyze the cartoon, one should examine the figures and symbols, understand the exaggeration employed to make a point, and infer the main analogy where two situations are compared to clarify the cartoonist's message.
In the context of checks and balances, the system was created to prevent corruption and abuse of power by ensuring that no single branch has unchecked authority. Political cartoons may critique or endorse the functioning of this system through analogy, exaggeration, and symbolism.
A different cartoonist may present a contrasting viewpoint, suggesting that the system works well or has different implications than what another has depicted. Therefore, the perspectives in political cartoons are subjective and can be debated based on the viewer's own knowledge and beliefs.