Final answer:
To investigate an authority cited in an article, one must evaluate the author's perspective, historical context, artistic elements, and citation accuracy, which involves understanding the author's purpose, checking for biases.
Step-by-step explanation:
The subject of this question revolves around evaluating the authority cited in an article, which involves analyzing the author's perspective, historical context, artistic elements, and citation accuracy. When investigating an authority, aspects such as the author's background, the purpose of their work, the historical context in which it was created, and any possible biases are crucial for establishing credibility.
To interpret the perspective of an authority accurately, one must consider several questions: what is the author's purpose (i.e., scholarly analysis, political advocacy, entertainment), are there any underlying assumptions or biases, is the evidence provided reliable, and how does the author's reasoning back their points? These are essential for understanding the author's viewpoint. Additionally, evaluating whether the author has the necessary expertise to speak on the subject matter and if the source (e.g., government document, personal diary, peer-reviewed journal) is appropriate given its intent, adds to the credibility of the authority.