Final answer:
Without specific context, Rosa's statement about there being no reason to save Carmen's things suggests a practical or minimalist viewpoint, potentially dismissing the sentimental value of the items. Such a sentiment is paralleled in the provided references where characters reject unnecessary or superfluous items or fears.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question 'Why did Rosa say that there is no reason to save Carmen's things?' seems to refer to a narrative where Rosa is expressing a sentiment about Carmen's possessions. Without explicit context provided, one can assume that Rosa may be denoting the futility or lack of emotional attachment to the items in question. Nonetheless, without a specific text or further details, giving a precise reason for Rosa's statement is challenging.
From the references provided, it appears that the characters often express sentiments that reject the traditional value attached to items or actions viewed as superfluous or unnecessary. In one instance a character rejects flowers as 'sentimental trash,' implying a practical or minimalist approach to life's offerings.
This type of sentiment is echoed in Nora's rejection of fanciful fears as she busies herself with her children's things, showcasing a focus on the pragmatic and essential. These examples from various texts exhibit characters who prioritize function over sentiment, suggesting that Rosa's statement could stem from similar motives - a practical dismissal of the need to hold onto objects that do not serve an immediate or practical purpose.