Final answer:
The statement that protesting American colonists demanded 'virtual' political representation from England is false. They wanted actual representation with locally elected officials who understood their specific needs and context, which differed significantly from the British concept of 'virtual' representation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The majority of protesting American colonists demanded actual political representation rather than the 'virtual' representation that the British government claimed they provided. Therefore, the statement that the majority of protesting American colonists demanded England allow them 'virtual' political representation is false. The colonists were in fact challenging the theory of virtual representation, advocating instead for a system where representatives were elected from the colonies to make decisions on their behalf, reflecting the local interests and needs.
During the period leading up to the American Revolution, debates surrounding representation were a contentious issue. The British government's assertion of virtual representation was met with considerable resistance from the colonists, who felt that it was impossible for members of the British Parliament to adequately represent colonial interests when they had never been to the colonies or experienced colonial life firsthand.
As part of their constitutional framework established in the late 1770s, the American colonists incorporated the idea that representation should closely mirror the constituents, allowing for a more direct form of representation. John Adams and others envisioned a 'natural aristocracy' within these assemblies, but insisted that such assemblies should act for the public good and represent the will of the people.