Final answer:
Upon testing, substituting (4, -2) into the original system of equations proves true, thereby verifying it as a solution. After modifying one of the equations as proposed, the system still has the same solution with (4, -2) satisfying both equations. Hence, Courtney's conjecture is correct based on this example.
Step-by-step explanation:
Part A: Verify the Solution
To verify that (4, -2) is a solution for the system of equations 3x - 7y = 26 and 5x + 2y = 16, we substitute x with 4 and y with -2.
- For the first equation, 3(4) - 7(-2) = 12 + 14 = 26, which matches the equation.
- For the second equation, 5(4) + 2(-2) = 20 - 4 = 16, which also matches the equation.
This confirms that (4, -2) is indeed a solution to both equations.
Part B: Create a New System
Multiplying the first equation 3x - 7y = 26 by 2 gives us 6x - 14y = 52. Adding this result to the second equation, we get:
- 6x - 14y + 5x + 2y = 52 + 16
- 11x - 12y = 68
Part C: Testing the Solution
We test if (4, -2) is a solution for the new system which includes the equations 3x - 7y = 26 and 11x - 12y = 68:
- The original first equation is unchanged, and we have already verified that (4, -2) is a solution.
- For the new equation, 11(4) - 12(-2) = 44 + 24 = 68, which means (4, -2) is a solution to this equation as well.
Thus, Courtney's conjecture is correct based on this example, as the solution set remains the same after the alteration of the equations.