Final answer:
Opponents of Brown v. Board argued against federal government involvement in local matters, but sometimes higher government intervention is necessary depending on the issue at hand. Civil rights and the protection of individual freedoms are examples of issues that may warrant higher government involvement.
Step-by-step explanation:
Opponents of Brown v. Board of Education argued that the federal government should not get involved in local matters such as how schools are run. However, there are certain situations where a higher level of government may need to overrule a lower one, depending on the issue at hand.
For example, in cases where the lower level of government is violating individuals' rights or perpetuating inequality, the higher level of government may step in to ensure justice and fairness.
One issue that may warrant a higher level of government intervention is civil rights. Historically, the federal government has intervened to combat racial segregation and discrimination, as seen in the Brown v. Board of Education case.
The Supreme Court ruled that racially segregated schools were a violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore, the federal government had the authority to overrule the policies of the local school boards.
In terms of individual freedoms, governments have the responsibility to protect the rights and freedoms of their citizens. However, there may be instances where certain freedoms are limited or taken away to prevent harm or maintain public order. For example, during times of national emergency or crisis, governments may impose restrictions on individual freedoms, such as curfews or limitations on assembly, to ensure public safety.