Final answer:
Marbury v. Madison established the principle of judicial review and upheld the doctrine of checks and balances.
Step-by-step explanation:
The significance of Marbury v. Madison in the history of the United States is that it established the principle of judicial review and upheld the doctrine of checks and balances. The case, decided in 1803 by Chief Justice John Marshall, asserted the power of the Supreme Court to review and possibly nullify the actions of Congress and the President. It confirmed that individuals have rights that even the President cannot abridge, but it did not expand the executive powers of the President or confirm the authority of Congress to make laws.
The two statements that reflect the significance of Marbury v. Madison are that it established the principle of judicial review (A) and upheld the doctrine of checks and balances (D). This case marked the first time the U.S. Supreme Court exercised the power to declare an act of Congress unconstitutional, reinforcing the court's role as a check on other branches of government.
Which two statements reflect the significance of Marbury v. Madison? The correct answers are:
A) It established the principle of judicial review.
D) It upheld the doctrine of checks and balances.
The 1803 Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison is a cornerstone in U.S. constitutional law. In this case, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, established the principle of judicial review, which allows the courts to examine and nullify the actions of the other branches of government and the states if those actions are deemed unconstitutional. This was the first time the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, emphasizing the power and influence of the judicial branch in the system of checks and balances outlined in the U.S. Constitution. The decision notably increased the court's own authority, even as it denied Marbury his commission by ruling that the law on which he based his claim was itself unconstitutional.