Final answer:
The statement "25 m east would be the correct way to represent the distance traveled by a woman moving to the east 25 meters" is false because the direction is not specified in the statement (option A).
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement lacks clarity about the direction of motion, only mentioning the distance traveled (25 meters) and specifying 'east' without connecting the direction to the movement. It presents a distance (25 meters) aligned with the cardinal direction 'east' but does not explicitly link this distance to the actual motion of the woman.
In describing motion or distance traveled, both the magnitude and direction are crucial components. However, the statement focuses solely on the distance (25 meters) without adequately defining the direction the woman is moving towards in relation to 'east.' Without specifying the direction explicitly, the statement fails to accurately represent the motion of the woman.
When describing movement or displacement, it's essential to include both the magnitude (distance) and direction to provide a comprehensive representation. For instance, a more accurate representation could be "The woman traveled 25 meters towards the east." This revised statement explicitly connects the distance traveled (25 meters) with the direction of motion (east), offering a clearer description of the woman's movement. option A