Final answer:
The Anti-Mascot movement is a contentious issue. Some argue that it should continue until all native mascots are gone from every school and professional team because these mascots can perpetuate harmful stereotypes of Indigenous people. On the other hand, there are those who believe that mascots can be respectful and a source of pride when developed in collaboration with tribal nations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Anti-Mascot movement is a contentious issue. Some argue that it should continue until all native mascots are gone from every school and professional team because these mascots can perpetuate harmful stereotypes of Indigenous people. The use of names like Indians, Braves, and Warriors can reinforce the racist view that Native Americans are uncivilized and uneducated. On the other hand, there are those who believe that mascots can be respectful and a source of pride when they are developed in collaboration with tribal nations, as seen in the examples of the University of Utah and Florida State University.
In conclusion, whether the Anti-Mascot movement should continue until all native mascots are gone depends on one's perspective. It is important to consider the opinions of Native Americans and respect their views on how they are represented in sports and other realms. Collaboration between universities and tribal nations can lead to mascots that are more respectful and representative. Ultimately, the goal should be to eliminate harmful stereotypes without erasing Native American culture and history.