Question

Rene Descartes said hate was the urge to withdraw from something that is thought bad. Aristotle saw hate as the incurable desire to annihilate an object. In psychology, Sigmund Freud defined hate as an ego state that wishes to destroy the source of its unhappiness. Which definition most accurately explains Tybalt's motivation for taking part in the feud between the Montagues and Capulets?

Option 1: The urge to withdraw from something that is thought bad.
Option 2: The incurable desire to annihilate an object.
Option 3: An ego state that wishes to destroy the source of unhappiness.

Answer 1

Tybalt's actions in 'Romeo and Juliet' are best described by Aristotle's definition of hate as 'the incurable desire to annihilate an object,' highlighting his deep-seated animosity towards the Montagues. Option number 2 is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

When considering the motivation behind Tybalt's participation in the feud between the Montagues and Capulets, option 2, the incurable desire to annihilate an object, seems to most accurately explain his behavior.

This definition aligns with Aristotle's view on hate and reflects Tybalt's intense hostility towards the Montague family, which seems beyond just a simple urge to withdraw (as suggested by Descartes) or an ego-driven response to a source of unhappiness (as suggested by Freud). Tybalt's actions in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet represent deep-seated animosity and an unyielding commitment to the eradication of his perceived enemies, indicative of a profound and persistent hatred.