Final answer:
When asking for a raise, employees might use fallacies such as an Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, or Denial of the Victim to justify their request, which can undermine the validity of their argument.
Step-by-step explanation:
When asking your boss for a raise, there are several fallacies that one might unintentionally use in making an argument. Three common fallacies could include:
- Appeal to Emotion: This occurs when the employee relies on an emotional plea rather than objective merit to justify the raise. For example, the employee might say, "You should give me a raise because no one works harder than me, and it has been a challenging year." While hard work is commendable, the emotional appeal does not objectively justify the raise.
- Begging the Question: In this case, the employee assumes what they need to prove. They might argue, "I need a raise because I am underpaid." However, without providing evidence to support that they are indeed underpaid, they are begging the question.
- The Denial of the Victim: Here, the employee may justify asking for a raise by asserting that they are owed more due to past injustices, such as not receiving a raise in previous years. An example might be, "I'm not asking for much, just what I'm due after all these years." This does not necessarily justify a raise; instead, it denies any negative implications of demanding more pay by framing themselves as a victim.
Using fallacies in an argument for a raise might not only weaken your case but also negatively affect your credibility. It's crucial to build your argument on solid reasoning and evidence.