Question

Ehrenreich writes, "The working poor, as they are approvingly termed, are in fact the major philanthropists of our society, and to be a member of the working poor is to be an anonymous donor, a nameless benefactor, to everyone else." What does the author mean by these statements? Do you agree or disagree, and why?

Answer 1

Ehrenreich argues that the working poor are the major philanthropists of society, as they contribute to the welfare of others through their labor. I agree with this perspective as the working poor play a pivotal role in society's functioning.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this statement, Ehrenreich suggests that the working poor, despite their financial hardships, are actually the ones who contribute the most to society by indirectly supporting others through their labor and low wages. They are like anonymous donors, constantly giving to others without recognition or appreciation.

This perspective challenges the notion that the wealthy are the primary benefactors of society. Instead, Ehrenreich argues that it is the working poor who are the true philanthropists, even though they may not have the financial means to give in the traditional sense.

I agree with Ehrenreich's statement because the working poor are essential to the functioning of society, as they perform necessary jobs and contribute to the economy. However, their contributions often go unnoticed and undervalued.