Final answer:
Explaining the purple part requires selecting the most relevant evidence to support your thesis, using logical reasoning, and considering the types of evidence that are valid in your discipline, whether it be from historical events, scientific experiments, or textual analysis.
Step-by-step explanation:
Explaining the purple part in your evidence involves presenting the information that supports your thesis in a comprehensive manner. This might include choosing evidence that directly relates to your thesis statement, elaborating on that evidence, and showing off your reasoning skills. For example, when discussing a figure from religious history, you typically would provide physical evidence. However, if that's not available, the logical approach is to rely on the preponderance of evidence from similar phenomena. It is beneficial to select details that will strengthen your argument and demonstrate your understanding to the reader. When marshalling evidence, you can draw from qualitative or quantitative data, as seen in using Desmond's quantitative evidence to appeal to logic. In subjects like English, logical development of points or direct quotations from the text are effective evidence. However, in other fields like science, evidence might consist of experimental results, such as the behavior of protons and electrons, or historical outcomes, like the end of apartheid in South Africa, supported by a logical sequence of events and precedents. In sum, the strengths of your argument depend on the evidence you select and how well you can interpret and present it. You should consider different types of evidence and arguments pertinent to your field of study that can support or contradict your claim, ensuring a well-rounded perspective. Therefore, it's important to thoroughly understand the types of evidence that are considered valid in your particular discipline.