100k views
0 votes
How do you think Plato would feel about modern democracies like the United States and Canada? In your opinion, what is the golden mean between lying and total honesty? Why might the golden mean differ from one situation to another?

User NtsDK
by
6.8k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Plato would likely have a negative view of modern democracies, while the golden mean between lying and total honesty can differ depending on the situation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Plato would likely have a negative view of modern democracies like the United States and Canada. He believed that democracy led to the rule of the average and the least ambitious, rather than the rule of the best-suited individuals. Plato preferred a form of government ruled by philosophers who had the knowledge and understanding to govern effectively.

The golden mean between lying and total honesty is a concept from Aristotle's ethics. It refers to finding a balance between extremes and acting in a moderate and virtuous way. The golden mean can differ from one situation to another because different circumstances may call for different levels of honesty or lies.

User Noel De Martin
by
7.7k points