Final answer:
The king is a static character because he does not undergo internal change throughout the story. He provides a stable figure in the narrative, potentially highlighting the development of other characters and remaining consistent in portraying certain thematic elements.
Step-by-step explanation:
In literary terms, the character of the king is a static character option B) because he doesn't learn a lesson throughout the story. Static characters are those whose essential character traits remain unchanged by the events of the narrative. They are contrasted with dynamic characters, who undergo significant internal change as a result of the story's events. While dynamic characters may experience growth or a transformation in their values, beliefs, or personality, static characters remain consistent. This consistency can serve several narrative functions: it provides a stable figure that may highlight the changes in other characters, or it may underscore the immutability of certain societal values or personal traits.
By not changing, the king can reveal and emphasize the development of dynamic characters around him. The persistence of his personality and actions can reflect the traits he embodies, such as power or wisdom, or, conversely, stubbornness or ignorance. If a character like the king does not evolve, it's not necessarily a sign of a poorly written character but rather a deliberate choice by the author to use the king as a reference point or to make a thematic statement.
Considering the static nature of such a character, it's important to note that being static does not equate to being flat or two-dimensional. A static character can have a well-developed personality and still serve as an effective tool in storytelling. When examining such characters, it's crucial to consider their role in the narrative and what their unchanging nature communicates about the story's larger message or the world in which they reside.