Question

In what three ways did Thoreau and Harris differ?

A) Thoreau did not survive his experience, but Harris did.
B) Thoreau settled in one place, while Harris traveled.
C) Thoreau appreciated simplicity and nature; Harris preferred modern society.
D) Harris traveled alone; Thoreau joined a group at Walden Pond.
E) Thoreau stayed near a town; Harris wanted to cross a distance.

Answer 1

Thoreau's life at Walden Pond and his writings show a strong appreciation for simplicity and nature, which is in stark contrast to a preference for a modern, complex society. Thus, the difference between Thoreau and Harris is that while Thoreau embraced a simple, nature-focused life, Harris preferred modern society, aligning with Option C.

Step-by-step explanation:

In considering how Thoreau and Harris differ, we should look at the context and ideas presented in Thoreau's works. Henry David Thoreau's philosophy, as depicted in his seminal works such as Civil Disobedience and Walden, greatly emphasizes the importance of individual freedom, self-reliance, and living in harmony with nature. He chose to live a life of simplicity at Walden Pond, asserting that less is more and advocating for a life far removed from the materialistic and often complex society.

In his writings, Thoreau underscores the significance of individual freedom and the notion of surviving with the essentials, which he believed were all that was necessary for a fulfilled life. This emphasis on essential living and the renouncement of societal pressures and materialistic desires form the cornerstone of Thoreau's lasting influence on the notions of individualism and environmentalism. He inspired countless individuals to rethink their lives and aspire towards a simpler way of living, where one's daily actions are more aligned with personal values and principles.

Therefore, given the options provided and the described characteristics of Thoreau, it seems that none of the options A, B, D, or E accurately reflect the ways in which Thoreau and Harris differed.

The most fitting difference, given what we know about Thoreau, is Option C: Thoreau appreciated simplicity and nature; Harris preferred modern society. Thoreau's life at Walden Pond stands in contrast to someone who would prefer the conveniences and complexities of a modern society. He valued simplicity, individualism, and a deep connection with the natural world over modern societal structures and advancements.