Final answer:
The false statement regarding the hockey puck moving with a constant velocity is option D: the puck has no kinetic energy. Pucks in motion always have kinetic energy based on their motion.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question concerns a hockey puck moving across the ice without changing its velocity and asks which statement is FALSE regarding this situation. According to Newton's first law of motion, an object in motion at a constant velocity will experience no net force. Therefore, option A is true - the puck is experiencing no net force since it's not accelerating. Option B states that the puck is moving with a constant speed, which aligns with the scenario described and is therefore also true. Option C suggests that the puck is not accelerating, and since the puck's velocity is constant, this is true: there is no acceleration. However, option D, which implies that the puck has no kinetic energy, is the FALSE statement. Even though the puck is not accelerating, as long as it is in motion, it possesses kinetic energy, which is dependent on its mass and the square of its velocity.