84.7k views
2 votes
Which do you think is a better solution for space components, and why?

A. Design components that can work in space.
B. Use everyday components, but seal them in a container that emulates conditions on Earth.

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

It is generally more effective to design components that can work in space, rather than using everyday components sealed in a container that emulates Earth conditions. Designing space-specific components allows for greater efficiency, durability, and compatibility with the unique challenges and hazards of space travel.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Better Solution for Space Components

When considering the better solution for space components, it is generally more effective to design components that can work in space rather than using everyday components sealed in a container that emulates Earth conditions. Designing space-specific components allows for greater efficiency, durability, and compatibility with the unique challenges and hazards of space travel. These components can be engineered to withstand extreme temperatures, vacuum conditions, radiation, and other factors that are not encountered on Earth.

To illustrate this, let's take an example of designing satellites and telescopes in space. The weight of a satellite affects the cost of launching it into space, so it is important to minimize weight. Using space-specific designs allows for lighter and more compact components, reducing the overall weight and cost of the satellite while still maintaining functionality and safety. Additionally, space-specific components can be optimized for the harsh conditions of space, such as protecting against meteor impacts, solar radiation, and temperature extremes.

User NYCeyes
by
8.8k points