232k views
5 votes
Which inference is best supported by the passage?

A. Each person has the option of walking or taking the bus to work.
B. Electric cars can also create toxic air pollutants.
C. Walking can have more than one benefit for society.
D. EPA regulations are not worthwhile attempts to reduce pollution.

User Andna
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The passage suggests hybrid cars have benefits but also trade-offs, leading to the inference that they may not suit everyone's needs.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best inference supported by the passage is that hybrid cars may not be the best choice for everyone. This can be deduced from the context of the passage, which highlights that while hybrid cars like the Toyota Prius have benefits such as great gas mileage and low emissions, there are trade-offs such as higher upfront costs, potentially less attractive design, slower acceleration, and less capacity for passengers compared to larger SUVs.

Therefore, option 2 or option 4 in the reference material most closely aligns with the information given in the passage.

User Knickedi
by
7.5k points