127k views
4 votes
"Which of these would BEST account for the change seen in this graph?

A) States have been added to the Union.
B) Laws regarding apportionment were changed.
C) Congressional redistricting had taken place.
D) The power of the Legislative branch has increased."

User Maheshakya
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The most likely cause for a change in a graph regarding congressional districts is Congressional redistricting, as states redraw district boundaries to favor certain political parties, a process known as gerrymandering.

Step-by-step explanation:

The change seen in the graph would best be accountof Representatives, this is based on population as determined by the National Census every ten years, according to Section 2 Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution. Given that states cannot gain more districts than they have been apportioned, and considering that states can gain but never lose districts, the most reasonable explanation for a significant change in a graph representing congressional districts would be that redistricting had occurred. This process, ofteed for by Congressional redistricting having taken place. When referring to the apportionment of seats in the House n called gerrymandering, involves state legislatures drawing district lines in a way that favors a certain political party. This can significantly alter which party wins a given district’s House seat without changing the absolute number of seats a state has, which is why Congressional redistricting is a more likely explanation than a change in laws regarding apportionment or a change in the Legislative branch's power.

User Yms
by
8.9k points