Final answer:
John Locke's view of the Glorious Revolution, not the Jamaican Coat of Arms. According to Locke, the Glorious Revolution was legitimate, thus the correct answer is 'True'.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement regarding the Jamaican Coat of Arms being remodeled more than five times is not addressed in the question provided, which pertains to John Locke's perspective on the Glorious Revolution. However, to address the question about John Locke: According to John Locke, the Glorious Revolution was a legitimate one.
John Locke believed in the right of people to revolt against a government that did not protect their natural rights. The Glorious Revolution of 1688, which involved the overthrow of King James II of England, was supported by Locke because it replaced the reigning monarch with one that, according to Locke, would respect these rights. Therefore, Locke viewed it as a legitimate change of power.