Final answer:
The treatment of holy places in the Mughal Empire by invaders varied by ruler. Aurangzeb destroyed resistant Hindu temples and taxed non-Muslims, while Akbar promoted religious harmony and cultural integration. Muslim Turks allowed Hindus certain freedoms with conditions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The treatment of the holy places of the Mughal Empire by invaders depended on the policies of the ruler at the time. Throughout its history, the empire saw different approaches to religious buildings and practices.
Under Aurangzeb, for example, a more orthodox view of Islam led to the destruction of Hindu temples of those who resisted his rule, and the imposition of taxes on non-Muslims like the jizya.
In contrast, Akbar, another Mughal emperor, abolished the jizya tax, encouraged the construction of Hindu temples, and promoted cultural harmony and a hybrid Indo-Islamic culture.
However, foreign invaders like the Muslim Turks treated Hindus as protected people, allowing them to practice their religion and maintain some of their holy places, as long as they paid taxes and tribute.
However, his successors like Aurangzeb imposed heavy taxes on non-Muslims, destroyed Hindu temples, and suppressed non-Muslim religious practices. This created tensions and discontent among the Hindu population.