Final answer:
According to historical records, statements a and b are false, as Aurangzeb's son assumed the throne much earlier and Shivaji was not a weak leader. Statements c and d are true, as Maharaja Ranjit Singh belonged to the Sukerchakiya misl, and Shivaji crowned himself king.
Step-by-step explanation:
To address the true or false statements related to Indian history:
-
- a. In the year 1807, Aurangzeb's son Bahadur Shah came to the throne. (F)
-
- b. Shivaji was a weak and incapable leader. (F)
-
- c. Maharaja Ranjit Singh was of the Sukerchakiya misl. (T)
-
- d. Shivaji crowned himself king and assumed the title of Chhatrapati. (T)
Step-by-step explanation:
-
- Aurangzeb's son Bahadur Shah came to the throne much earlier than 1807, and he is also known as Bahadur Shah I. The year 1807 is over a century past Aurangzeb's rule. Thus, statement a is false.
-
- Regarding statement b, Shivaji was a strong and effective leader who founded the Maratha empire and consistently thwarted Mughals, as evident from the historical narrative provided above. Therefore, statement b is false.
-
- Statement c is historically accurate as Maharaja Ranjit Singh did belong to the Sukerchakiya misl before founding the Sikh empire, making statement c true.
-
- Finally, statement d is true, Shivaji did crown himself king in 1674 and took on the royal title of Chhatrapati as a declaration of his sovereignty, which is supported by the given historical facts.