Final answer:
Researchers at Lund University may disagree with certain assumptions about learning Russian due to studies on bilingual education and the cognitive effects of language structure. They might value teaching Russian both for communication and its broader cognitive benefits, contrary to the notion that English-only education is most effective.
Step-by-step explanation:
The researchers at Lund University might disagree with some of the blog writer's assumptions about the benefits of learning Russian based on the evidence presented in various studies. For instance, according to Johns Hopkins University researchers, being bilingual has positive effects on learning, indicating that teaching Russian alongside English can be beneficial. This counters the assumption that instruction in English only would be more effective. Also, the studies mentioned by Lucy highlight the impact language structure can have on behavior, suggesting that learning Russian might provide different cognitive and behavioral advantages compared to solely learning English. This would support the idea that teaching Russian can be beneficial for reasons beyond mere communication.
Dr. Liudmila Riabova's involvement in cross-disciplinary discussions about Russia's statehood might emphasize the importance of understanding Russian to engage deeply with the topic across different fields. Then, Peterson's rhetorical strategies, such as appealing to emotions, may be seen as an effective way to advocate for the importance of learning foreign languages like Russian to enhance solidarity and prevent the loss of valuable language curricula.
Considering the different perspectives and research, it appears that the Lund University researchers would advocate for the inclusion of Russian in educational curricula not just for communication, but also for the cognitive and behavioral impacts language learning can have, which may be overlooked by those assuming English-only instruction is superior.