Final answer:
The effectiveness of common propaganda techniques like Testimonial, Bandwagon, Name-calling, Glittering Generalities, Plain-Folks Appeal, and Card Stacking varies, but each can be persuasive in certain contexts. Most are either effective or sometimes effective, depending on how the audience perceives the information.
Step-by-step explanation:
The effectiveness of common propaganda techniques can vary depending on context and audience, but generally, each has been used because it can be quite effective in persuasion.
- Testimonial is Sometimes Effective: Using a public figure or expert to endorse a product or idea can be persuasive, but if the audience does not find the endorser credible, this technique can backfire.
- Bandwagon is Effective: Persuading people by suggesting that everyone is doing it and so should they can be powerful, as humans often want to conform to social norms.
- Name-calling is Sometimes Effective: Discrediting an opponent by labels or insults can influence opinions, particularly if the audience holds preconceived bias, though it might also be seen as unprofessional or irrelevant to the argument.
- Glittering Generalities is Effective: The use of vague, positive phrases that are emotionally appealing can be quite persuasive because they tap into people's values and emotions without providing specifics.
- Plain-Folks Appeal is Effective: This technique, which makes the speaker appear ordinary and relatable, can effectively build trust with an audience by reducing perceived distance and elevating perceived sincerity.
- Card Stacking is Sometimes Effective: Presenting only positive or negative aspects to make a case can be influential but can also lead to skepticism if the audience senses important information is being omitted.