Final answer:
Scientists were resistant to Ohm's model for electricity because it was a novel idea that contradicted existing theories, lacked experimental verification, and was empirical rather than a fundamental law. Technological limitations and nonohmic behavior of some materials also posed challenges to its acceptance.
Step-by-step explanation:
Other scientists were resistant to using Ohm's model for electricity, largely because at the time of its introduction, it was a novel concept that challenged existing theories and lacked widespread experimental verification beyond Ohm's own work. Georg Simon Ohm's discovery, now known as Ohm's Law, was groundbreaking in suggesting that the current that flows through most substances is directly proportional to the voltage applied. However, this principle did not align with the scientific community's prevailing electrical theories.
It is also worth considering that Ohm's contemporary scientific community might have expected a more complicated relationship between voltage and current. Additional skepticism might have stemmed from the fact that Ohm's Law is an empirical observation rather than a fundamental law of nature, like Newton's laws. This meant that the law was based on experimental data rather than theoretical underpinnings, which made it less convincing to some in the scientific community.
Furthermore, resistance to the adoption of Ohm's model could have been compounded by technological limitations of the time, insufficiently sensitive equipment, or variability in materials that led to some substances not following Ohm's law (nonohmic behavior). This would have made it difficult for other scientists to replicate Ohm's results consistently, thereby raising doubts about the universality of his model for electricity.