Final answer:
The tone in Rusesabagina's actions during the Rwandan Genocide is best described as hopeful, as he employed deception and bribery to save lives. Several rhetorical strategies are highlighted, including ethos, pathos, and logos, emphasizing the importance of credible, emotional, and logical appeals in persuasive communication. Option B is correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student is asking about the tone used by Paul Rusesabagina, the hotel manager who saved lives during the Rwandan Genocide. Throughout the paragraphs provided, we can sense different tones used by individuals in response to the harrowing circumstances they faced. The first paragraph sets a stark and haunting tone as it references the genocide and a desperate plea that went unheeded. The second paragraph reflects a determined and fierce desire to live despite overwhelming odds.
The third paragraph provides guidance for communicating fear persuasively, utilizing empathy to connect with an audience. The fourth paragraph outlines rhetorical strategies including ethos, pathos, and logos that lend credibility and evoke emotion. The fifth paragraph details struggles of refugees using evasion to protect themselves, which is resourceful and strategic. The sixth paragraph discusses facing fear with either cowardice or courage, which signifies a conflicting tone of vulnerability and valiance. Finally, the last paragraph underlines the effectiveness of blending factual (logos) with emotional appeal (pathos) for persuasion.
Considering Rusesabagina’s actions during the genocide, he used a combination of negotiation, persuasion, deception, and bribery—which aligns with option (b) Hopeful; he uses deception and bribery. His resourcefulness and quick thinking were pivotal in protecting the lives of those sheltering at the hotel.