21.6k views
0 votes
If you wanted to tell your reader what happened in a story without actually using any words from the story, which of these processes would you be engaged in?

A. Summary
B. Quotation
C. Paraphrase
D. Plagiarism

User Borealid
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

If you want to convey the content of a story using your own words without shortening it significantly, you would be engaged in paraphrasing. Paraphrasing requires restating the original ideas in a new form while maintaining the text's original meaning and should be properly cited to avoid plagiarism. The correct option for this process is C. Paraphrase.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you were to communicate what happened in a story without using any words from the story itself, you would be engaged in the process of paraphrasing.

Paraphrasing involves taking information or ideas from another text and restating them using your own words, which is different from summarizing, as it does not involve drastically shortening the content. It aims to reflect the original message with accuracy while using distinct language. Unlike quotations, which involve reproducing text word for word, paraphrasing allows you to incorporate the original idea while maintaining your personal writing style.

It's key to remember that proper citation is still required when you paraphrase, to give credit to the original author and to avoid any form of plagiarism - which is the act of presenting someone else's work as your own. Therefore, when telling the reader what happened in a story using your own words, it would be ideal to choose paraphrase over the other options provided.

Thus, the correct option in the final answer is C. Paraphrase.

User Adam Dingle
by
8.4k points