Final answer:
This editorial presents a British merchant's justification for the continuation of the opium trade with China despite ethical concerns, emphasizing economic benefits for Britain and the right to free trade.
Step-by-step explanation:
Editorial: Opium Trade – A British Merchant's Perspective
The opium trade has become a contentious issue between Britain and China. As a British merchant, I assert that while the trade poses moral questions, it is vital for our economic interests and should continue. Some argue that opium ravages the fabric of Chinese society; however, this overlooks that every nation has the right to trade freely and to determine its own social policies.
Opposing Point: Critics highlight the disastrous social impact of opium addiction on the people of China, claiming it undermines their social order and drains their economy of silver.
Rebuttal: The British did not impose opium upon China. It was the responsibility of the Chinese authorities to control their borders and their people's choices. Furthermore, opium is but a commodity, like tea or silk, subject to the laws of supply and demand.
Supporting Points:
- Opium provides a solution to the balance of trade issue with China, creating a market for our goods where none existed before.
- Trading opium is highly profitable, benefiting not only merchants but also the British economy as a whole through taxation and employment.
- Recreational substances are used worldwide, and the prohibition by Chinese law is not a sufficient reason for British traders to abstain from a lucrative market.
In conclusion, while the ethics of opium trade are debatable, the economic benefits for Britain are clear, and our maritime superiority has cemented the trade as a lawful enterprise. It is in the interests of Britain, and indeed all nations, to uphold the freedom of international commerce.