Final answer:
Based on the map and information provided about the 2000 U.S. presidential election, the correct statement is that Gore received more popular votes than Bush. Option B is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
After reviewing the 2000 U.S. presidential election information, we can assess the following statements based on the details provided:
B) Gore received more popular votes than Bush. According to the data, Al Gore did receive approximately 540,000 more popular votes than George W. Bush, making this statement correct.
C) Had Bush lost the state of Arkansas, Gore would have won the election. This statement cannot be confirmed without additional information about the electoral votes of Arkansas and the overall electoral count.
E) Had he won any state he lost, Gore would have become President. This is not necessarily true since it would depend on the electoral votes of the particular state(s) in question, and not all states have enough electoral votes to have changed the outcome.
The other statements did not have enough context or were incorrect based on the information provided:
A) There were two candidates in the Election of 2000. This statement is misleading because while Bush and Gore were the main candidates, others like Ralph Nader also ran.
D) Democrats had no electoral success in the South. This cannot be confirmed without knowing which states are considered in the South and the electoral outcomes of those states.
Statements regarding Arkansas's impact on the election and the idea that winning any state would have guaranteed Gore's presidency cannot be substantiated without additional data.