Final answer:
This essay critically evaluates logical fallacies in two differing arguments, acknowledges personal biases from a news report, employs various reasoning strategies, and concludes with a call to action, while also reflecting on the influence of cognitive biases in decision-making.
Step-by-step explanation:
In this essay, I evaluate the logical fallacies in arguments with differing conclusions and analyze the influence of my own biases influenced by a news report. Initially, I define the conclusions of the debates and examine the evidence presented. By utilizing inductive and deductive reasoning, I outline the logical foundation of each position. I also reflect on my own cognitive biases and how they may have swayed my judgment.
Throughout the essay, I incorporate strategies of reasoning such as analogy, cause and effect, and comparison and contrast, to construct a comprehensive argument that is supported by credible academic and professional sources. This approach ensures that my argument is not based on biased information and adheres to logical coherence. By concluding with a call to action, I express my position clearly and urge readers to consider a particular course of action in response to the issue at hand.
Finally, through critical reflection and metacognition, I consider the consequences of different actions and the lessons learned from evaluating my previous decision-making process. This self-assessment facilitates a deeper understanding of my own thinking patterns, allowing me to approach similar situations more objectively in the future and minimize the role of cognitive biases in my decision-making.