Final answer:
In Gulliver's Travels, Gulliver's fights with the people of Blefuscu and the rats are different in nature. The fight with Blefuscu involves a conflict between nations, while the encounter with the rats is a survival situation. The description of freedom also differs, with the people of Blefuscu pursuing freedom from oppression and the rats driven by instinct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Gulliver's Travels is a satirical novel written by Jonathan Swift that depicts the adventures of Lemuel Gulliver in various imaginary lands. In Part 2, Chapter 1, Gulliver recounts his fight against the people of Blefuscu and his encounter with a group of rats. While both fights involve physical confrontations, there are some key differences between the two.
First, the fight with the people of Blefuscu is a result of a long-standing conflict between their nation and Lilliput, the land Gulliver previously visited, over the proper way to crack eggs. The fight is described as a battle between two opposing nations, with Gulliver representing the side of the Lilliputians. On the other hand, Gulliver's encounter with the rats is more of a survival situation, as he finds himself trapped in a narrow passage with a group of aggressive rats.
In terms of the description of freedom, Gulliver sees the people of Blefuscu as having a similar desire for freedom as himself. Although they are physically smaller and have different customs, their fight against Lilliputian oppression represents their pursuit of freedom. On the other hand, Gulliver's encounter with the rats highlights a different perspective on freedom. The rats, driven by their instinct for survival, are portrayed as ruthless and relentless, which contrasts with Gulliver's desire for freedom that is rooted in reason and rationality.