Final answer:
A binding price ceiling potentially leads to a more efficient outcome in a perfectly competitive market compared to a monopoly, as it encourages production closer to the socially optimal output where price equals marginal cost.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a perfectly competitive market, a binding price ceiling may lead to a more efficient outcome compared to a monopolistic market. In perfectly competitive markets, firms produce where price equals marginal cost, leading to allocative efficiency where the social benefits of production match the social costs. This market structure also results in productive efficiency because goods are produced at the lowest possible average cost. However, a monopolist maximizes profit where marginal revenue equals marginal cost, which is at a lower quantity and higher price compared to perfect competition. A price ceiling in a monopoly can potentially reduce the deadweight loss by making the monopolist produce more than it would otherwise and at a lower price, bringing the outcome closer to the socially optimal point of production where price equals marginal cost. Yet, given monopolists’ already restricted output relative to the competitive case, the gain in efficiency is less clear than in a competitive market.