Final answer:
The correct relation when ––→BX bisects ∠ABC is m∠ABX = 1/2 ∠ABC, meaning the bisector creates two congruent angles each half of ∠ABC. 2m∠ABX = m∠ABC is incorrect as it contradicts the principle of a bisector.
Step-by-step explanation:
When the segment ––→BX bisects ∠ABC, it means that ∠ABX and ∠CBX are congruent. Since △ABX ≅ △CBX, they are similar triangles which implies that their corresponding angles are equal. Therefore, m∠ABX = m∠CBX. The claim that m∠ABX = 1/2 ∠ABC is the correct one as the bisector creates two angles (∠ABX and ∠CBX) that are each half of the total angle ∠ABC.
Contradicting the incorrect claim, it's not true that 2m∠ABX = m∠ABC since this equation would imply that ∠ABX is half of ∠ABC, which is impossible if ––→BX is a bisector. Thus, m∠ABX = 1/2 ∠ABC accurately describes the relationship between the angles when a segment bisects an angle of a triangle.