44.5k views
1 vote
According to Tuskegee, why is achieving political equality a zero-sum game, whereas achieving economic equality is not a zero-sum game?

User Crolle
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Achieving political equality is often seen as a zero-sum game, where one group gains while another loses, while achieving economic equality can benefit all members of society.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of achieving political equality, it is often considered a zero-sum game. This means that for one group to gain political power or rights, another group must lose or have their power diminished.

For example, in the case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, the African American men who were denied treatment suffered a loss of political power and rights while the researchers and government officials maintained their power and authority.

On the other hand, achieving economic equality is not necessarily a zero-sum game. Economic equality refers to the fair distribution of wealth and resources within a society.

By implementing policies that promote equal access to education, job opportunities, and social welfare programs, it is possible to improve the economic circumstances of marginalized groups without taking away from the economic well-being of others.

Overall, while achieving political equality may involve a trade-off, achieving economic equality can be approached in a way that benefits all members of society.

User Jay Bienvenu
by
8.0k points