187k views
3 votes
Do you think combat and warfare were more personal at this time period when compared to modern warfare? Please explain your answer.

a) Yes, because of close combat.
b) No, because modern warfare uses advanced technology.
c) It's hard to compare.
d) Not sure.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Combat and warfare were more personal at this time period compared to modern warfare due to the advancements in technology that have made combat more impersonal and destructive.

Step-by-step explanation:

The nature of combat and warfare was more personal at the time period being referred to when compared to modern warfare. This is because of the advancements in technology that have made modern warfare more mechanized and lethal. In the past, combat often involved close-range combat where soldiers could see and engage with their enemy face-to-face. However, with the introduction of advanced technology, such as machine guns, artillery shells, and aircraft, combat has become more impersonal and destructive. For example, in World War I, soldiers faced new weaponry like tanks, airplanes, and poison gas, which drastically changed the nature of warfare. The widespread use of these weapons often resulted in mass destruction and casualties, with soldiers' competence and bravery rendered irrelevant in the face of overwhelming firepower.

User Jayachandra A
by
8.0k points