Final answer:
A judge might consider economic feasibility, geological suitability, public acceptance, regulatory compliance, and environmental justice, as well as health and environmental effects of criteria pollutants, to decide on issuing an interdiction against a toxic waste site.
Step-by-step explanation:
A judge might use several criteria to determine whether or not to issue an interdiction against building a toxic waste site in a populated area. These criteria include:
- Economic feasibility and cost of land, assessing whether the high cost of land purchase makes the project economically unviable.
- Geological suitability to prevent hazardous materials from contaminating local aquifers and the environment.
- Public acceptance and potential resistance from the local community, evaluating environmental, health, safety concerns, and aesthetic implications.
- Regulatory compliance with regulations that apply to treatment, storage, and disposal facilities, including land disposal restrictions.
- Environmental justice, considering the disproportionate impact on minority and poor communities in terms of exposure to waste and pollution.
The presence of criteria pollutants specified by the EPA, and their health and environmental effects, may also influence a judge's decision. That encompasses the protection of public health and the environment from pollutants such as carbon monoxide, ground-level ozone, and particulate matter.