Final Answer:
Without the specific context or content of paragraph 4 and the author's claim, it is not possible to provide the two quotations that would offer sufficient and relevant evidence to support the author's assertion.
Step-by-step explanation:
The response to this question is dependent on the content of paragraph 4 and the specific claim made by the author. Without knowing the details of the paragraph and the author's argument, it is not feasible to identify the two quotations that would provide sufficient and relevant evidence. The effectiveness of evidence is context-specific, and without the specific content of paragraph 4, it is not possible to determine which quotations would best support the author's claim.
In academic or analytical writing, evidence is crucial to substantiate claims and arguments. Relevant quotations should directly align with the author's assertion, providing support and validity to their claims. The choice of quotations depends on the context, subject matter, and the specific argument being made. Without these details, any attempt to provide quotations would be speculative and may not accurately address the author's claim in paragraph 4.
In conclusion, the response to this question emphasizes the need for contextual information to identify the relevant quotations supporting the author's claim in paragraph 4. The absence of specific details prevents the selection of appropriate evidence, highlighting the importance of considering the broader context when analyzing and supporting arguments in written work.