Question

Write an Argument. Folk tales like "The People Could Fly" often make readers reflect on the ways we perceive our world. Consider the common saying "seeing is believing" and its meaning. After reading the texts in this collection, do you believe this saying is true? You will draw from "The People Could Fly" and other texts in the collection to write an argument that states and supports your position. Your response should be 4-5 paragraphs.

Answer 1

Literature like "The People Could Fly" challenges the saying "seeing is believing" by demonstrating how stories communicate deeper truths through metaphor and imagery without requiring empirical evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering the folk tale "The People Could Fly" and reflecting upon the phrase "seeing is believing," it is evident that literature often challenges this notion. Folk tales, by their very nature, encourage readers to look beyond the surface and to perceive the world not just through empirical evidence but also through metaphor and deeper meaning. The common saying suggests that only through direct observation can one truly understand and believe in what is occurring; however, stories like "The People Could Fly" offer a different perspective wherein belief comes from accepting the tale's underlying truths, regardless of their physical impossibility.

Stories have the power to convey truths through fiction, metaphor, and imagery, which may not require physical evidence to be believed. Such literature speaks to the human condition, explores societal issues, and conveys universal themes that resonate with readers despite their fantastical elements. Drawing upon elements of character and plot, along with the theme and figurative language, a strong argumentative essay can delve into how literature often communicates emotional and philosophical truths that don't require empirical evidence to be felt and understood.

"The People Could Fly," with its magical elements, enriches the readers' understanding of cultural heritage, human longing for freedom, and the power of hope. In analyzing this story objectively and subjectively, readers can explore how the work's non-literal elements can deeply influence our perception of reality, solidarity, and resilience. By coupling personal reflection with factual analysis from the text, an essay can present a well-rounded argument supporting an interpretation that transcends literal belief. Thus, it becomes clear that seeing, in a concrete sense, is not always a precondition for believing.