Final answer:
The Lacks family felt exploited, having never consented to the use of Henrietta's cells and received no recognition or financial benefit, while the Hopkins doctors were focused on the scientific discoveries and advancements enabled by the immortal HeLa cells. Later, the ethical considerations were acknowledged, granting the Lacks family control over the genetic sequence publication.
Step-by-step explanation:
The intent and emotion of the Lacks family contrast sharply with that of the Hopkins doctors regarding Henrietta’s rapidly dividing cells. The Lacks family was unaware of the use of Henrietta’s cells and did not give consent for their collection, leading to feelings of exploitation and loss. Despite the HeLa cells ’ huge contributions to pivotal medical research, the Lacks family never saw any recognition or financial benefit from the commercialization of the cells and continued to live in poverty. In contrast, the Hopkins doctors were primarily focused on the groundbreaking scientific discovery and the potential medical advancements the immortal cells could offer. Their intent was to develop a cell line that could withstand continuous division for research, which the HeLa cells successfully achieved, leading to significant scientific progress such as the polio vaccine and AIDS research.
Furthermore, while the family desired acknowledgment and compensation for Henrietta’s contribution to medical science, the Hopkins doctors viewed the situation through the lens of scientific opportunity and advancement. The situation reflects a complex interaction between the personal impacts on the Lacks family and the ethical considerations of the medical and research community. Not until decades later was the ethical lapse recognized, with the family gaining control over the publication of the genetic sequence of Henrietta's cells, a small yet significant acknowledgment of the Lacks family's rights and contributions.