Final answer:
Isabel can engage in close reading and ask nuanced questions about verb consistency and showing versus telling in her friends' writing. She should also observe body language for additional context and use reflective questions to enhance understanding. Summarizing responses can lead to more specific follow-up questions during peer review.
Step-by-step explanation:
When Isabel is asking questions based on what her friends say, it's essential that she pays attention not only to their words but also to accompanying nonverbal cues like body language. Doing a close reading of her friends' statements will allow her to ask more nuanced questions that can lead to a deeper understanding of their perspectives.
For instance, if her friends are discussing a draft report, she might ask, “Are verb tenses consistent?” or “How can you show rather than just tell about your subject?” to provide constructive feedback.
Furthermore, reflecting on the answers her friends give and considering what their advice means personally can help Isabel form follow-up questions. She might, for instance, think about what sorts of peer review questions are most helpful for improving work, like asking her friends what kind of audience they are writing for or whether their purpose is clear in their writing.
Observing body language, such as whether her peers are making eye contact or seem distracted, can help her decide when to press for more information or when to give space.
Isabel can benefit from summarizing her friend's answers and using this summary to ask about specific aspects of their experiences. This approach ensures relevance and specificity in dialog, which is vital for effective communication and understanding. The ultimate goal of peer discussion is to generate a productive conversation that can enhance everyone's work.