163k views
3 votes
Explain one major difference between Miller and Johnson’s and Hall’s historical interpretation?

A) Miller and Johnson focus on social aspects; Hall focuses on political events
B) Miller and Johnson emphasize economic factors; Hall emphasizes cultural developments
C) Miller and Johnson rely on primary sources; Hall relies on secondary sources
D) Miller and Johnson present a biased perspective; Hall offers a balanced view

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Miller and Johnson's historical interpretation emphasizes economic factors, while Hall's focuses on cultural developments. Hence, the correct answer is option B.

Step-by-step explanation:

One major difference between Miller and Johnson's and Hall's historical interpretation is that Miller and Johnson emphasize economic factors; Hall emphasizes cultural developments. This corresponds to option B from the given choices. Miller and Johnson's analysis likely involves examining economic systems, labor relations, and trade patterns, while Hall might look at traditions, values, ideologies, and the arts. Differences between economic and cultural interpretations are significant as they change the focus and potentially the understanding of historical events.

User Vagaus
by
7.2k points