152k views
4 votes
Had you been an advisor to the department of agricultural practices, what would you have advised the farmers for treating their fields - chemical weedicides or biological control of wheat? Why?

A) Chemical weedicides; more effective in large-scale farming
B) Biological control of wheat; environmentally friendly and sustainable
C) Chemical weedicides; quicker results and higher yield
D) Biological control of wheat; less harmful to the soil and ecosystem

User Renatojf
by
7.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

I recommend biological control of wheat due to its environmental friendliness and sustainability. It maintains biodiversity and soil health, aligning with organic farming practices, and offers a non-toxic alternative to chemical weedicides, which can harm ecosystems and lead to pesticide resistance.

Step-by-step explanation:

If I had been an advisor to the department of agricultural practices, I would have advised farmers on a case-by-case basis, but generally, I would tend towards biological control of wheat over chemical weedicides. Biological control is environmentally friendly and sustainable. It actively contributes to maintaining biodiversity and reducing the damage to the soil and ecosystem. Biotechnology has introduced crops engineered to be resistant to diseases and pests, which can minimize the use of synthetic pesticides. Furthermore, biocontrol practices, like the use of beneficial insects, are becoming more popular and can provide natural and non-toxic alternatives to chemical pesticides.

While chemical weedicides can offer quicker results and might be more effective in large-scale operations, the excessive use leads to environmental drawbacks, such as contamination of groundwater, destruction of natural enemies, and development of pesticide resistance. Improved pest control practices like intercropping and the use of biopesticides align with organic farming methods that are renewable and degrade without harming the environment.

User Hiyasat
by
8.6k points