Question

How did Jackson’s view of the origins of European American/American Indian conflict compare with Tecumseh’s view?

Option 1: Jackson believed that conflicts arose due to misunderstandings, while Tecumseh saw them as a result of territorial disputes.
Option 2: Jackson believed that conflicts were inevitable due to cultural differences, while Tecumseh believed that they were a result of power struggles.
Option 3: Jackson believed that conflicts were a result of economic disparities, while Tecumseh believed that they were due to conflicting religious beliefs.
Option 4: Jackson believed that conflicts arose due to a clash of civilizations, while Tecumseh saw them as a result of broken treaties.

Answer 1

Option 4: Jackson believed that conflicts arose due to a clash of civilizations, while Tecumseh saw them as a result of broken treaties.

Step-by-step explanation:

The views of Andrew Jackson and Tecumseh on the origins of European American/American Indian conflict were starkly different. Jackson, as depicted in the accounts of his presidency and policies, saw the conflict arising from a clash of civilizations, where Native Americans needed to be moved west of the Mississippi River to make way for what he considered to be 'civilization and progress'.

The Indian Removal Act of 1830, which he pushed through Congress, resulted in the displacement of several Native American tribes and was a reflection of his beliefs that this removal was a necessity for the United States to develop. On the other hand, Tecumseh, along with his brother Tenskwatawa, believed the conflicts stemmed from broken treaties, white expansion, and the erosion of Native culture and lands.

Tecumseh's efforts to encourage a pan-Indian alliance against American expansion further indicate his view that the conflict was about preserving Native American rights and territories.