12.2k views
3 votes
How did the Hittite Empire compare in size to the Egyptian empire around 1450 B.C.? Which do you think was more advantageously situated?

User Niriel
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The Hittite Empire was larger than the Egyptian Empire in size and was advantageously situated due to its control of trade routes and international influence.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Hittite Empire and the Egyptian Empire were major powers in the Near East around 1450 B.C. in the late Bronze Age. The size of the Hittite Empire was larger than the Egyptian Empire. The Hittite Empire included all of Asia Minor and parts of Syria, while the Egyptian Empire was mainly centered around Egypt itself.

The Hittite Empire was advantageously situated because of its strategic location in Anatolia (modern-day Turkey), which allowed it to control trade routes between the eastern Mediterranean and Mesopotamia. This gave them the opportunity to dominate trade and maintain alliances with other regions. On the other hand, the Egyptian Empire was advantageously situated due to its control of the Nile River, which provided fertile land for agriculture, transportation, and trade.

Overall, both empires had their advantages in terms of size and strategic location, but the Hittite Empire's extensive territorial control and control of trade routes made it more advantageously situated in terms of international influence and economic power.

User BastanteCaro
by
8.2k points