Final answer:
The question presents an argument for the need for the Gospel to be in a relationship with God. However, the argument is considered circular reasoning and not a valid proof. A more appropriate approach would involve evidence and personal experiences to demonstrate the transformative power of the Gospel.
Step-by-step explanation:
This question involves a theological argument based on the assumption that the Bible is true. However, it is important to note that this argument is considered to be circular reasoning and is therefore not a valid proof. The argument assumes the existence of God in order to prove the existence of God, which is a logical fallacy.
To establish a solid proof or argument for the need for the Gospel to be in a relationship with God, it would be more appropriate to present evidence or reasoning based on personal experiences, testimonies, and interpretations of scripture that highlight the transformative power of the Gospel message in individuals' lives.