Final answer:
A fair way to split up teams is generally considered preferable because it promotes cooperation, trust, and a sense of fairness among the participants.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering the fairness of splitting up teams, it is important to take into account the preferences and goals of the individuals involved. Experimental data shows that players in a game are not solely motivated by self-interest; they also value fairness. Therefore, a fair split is likely to be more acceptable to the participants.
Moreover, when players have the opportunity to play the game multiple times and establish a relationship, fair splits become even more important. If one player consistently offers unfair splits, it creates a sense of mistrust and the likelihood of future unfair offers, leading the other player to reject them.
In conclusion, a fair way to split up teams is generally considered preferable because it promotes cooperation, trust, and a sense of fairness among the participants.
A team split tells the audience, the adjudicator and your opposition what your team's arguments will be, and which speaker is presenting them. The easiest way to come up with a good team split is to write down all your arguments, and think of all the different categories that they might come under.